|
JournalFire makes it easy to share and discuss journal articles. Learn more...
|
Scholarly societies are a place where the members, the scientists, should have clout to affect change. Unfortunately, many societies have contracted with for-profit publishers (Wiley, Blackwell, Elsevier) to manage their journal. This lock-in to a cash flow and contract has made it difficult for the society leadership to re-envision their business as builders of a community of practice and intellectual pursuit able to enhance knowledge sharing among their members. Here, finally, is an article stating the case for change and its arguments support the principles behind JournalFire.
___
Chris Armbruster, Moving out of Oldenbourg's long shadow: what is the future for society publishing? Abstract: "The Internet and the ris ... read more
The legacy pattern of authors transferring copyright to publishers for the service of peer-review, certification and distribution needs to stop for the research community to have the flexibility for new solutions and to make the most of their work. When copyright is transferred to publishers the sharing and re-use of results among researchers is severely limited because the right to reproduce, copy and distribute is no longer within the rights of the author. To make the most of new technologies to find more effective ways to make the most of research results authors can and should:
- change publisher agreements or add an addendum to retain copyright and award a nonexclusive license to the publisher to publish and distribute onli ... read more
