|
JournalFire makes it easy to share and discuss journal articles. Learn more...
|
test
I looked up a number of journals on journalprices.com, as was recommended during the recent session.
Suprisingly I found that the "high profile" journals we often complain about aren't actually more expensive than
the new open access journals (at least using the measure this website uses).
example (Relative Cost Index):
Nature: 0.07
PLOS Biology: 0.12
Journal of Neuroscience: 0.28
Neuron: 0.31
So, does this mean that in terms of effective cost for the institute (including what the library pays for access in terms of Nature, or the author in terms of PLOS), is Nature the cheapest of the above?
From this it seems to me that the journal that are really the problem are high priced, commerical journals that few people read but charge a high access fee.
For example: Hippocampus (3.1) or Cognitive Neuropsychology (3.98) (and there are many with >40).
Thus, high-profile journals like Nature are _not_ the problem?
